Abortion after IVF and the economics of choice
via XX Factor. In this article Amanda Marcotte comments on the alarm raised over a small number of women who decide to have an abortion following IVF. I agree entirely with Marcotte’s criticism of people who argue “that the women who have abortions after IVF are bad people, too fickle to deserve rights.” If we really trust women, we should respect all choices.
That said, I need to observe the problem with this article is that it only addresses a tiny percentage of women in the United States who are privileged enough to have health insurance that will pay for IVF and abortion (in fact, the story grew out of cases in Great Britain, where both IVF and abortion are covered by the National Health Insurance).
What about the millions of women who are denied access to abortion because it’s not covered by Medicaid (and under the new “health reform” package will not be covered by private health insurance either)? Or the millions of women whose choices to reproduce are constrained by economic circumstances, or if they do find the resources to reproduce, are condemned as being “selfish”?
This isn’t the only article at XX Factor that bugs me — it seems this column is aimed almost entirely at privileged women who have the money and leisure to worry about things like Snooki and denim-colored diapers.
Seriously, is this sort of writing really advancing rights for all women? Or is this type of women’s blogging simply feeding into a larger addiction to snark? Maybe I’m expecting too much. . .