Yesterday, I gave an interview for our local Fox affiliate (above is a picture of me in the green room). Here’s a link to the video. I thought I did pretty well. I’ll have more to say about this later.
#AHA2015 #s99 Blogging and the Future of Scholarship
via Storify
As you can see, there was a robust Twitter backchannel on this session. I’m not sure if it was the most tweeted though!
Further thoughts In Re: Cassandra C.
I should have read this before my previous post. It appears there is good reason to doubt that Cassandra C has the maturity to make medical decisions (i.e. it looks like Mom is running the show). Still, it’s worth using this case to think about what defines a mature minor and whether young people who meet these criteria should be able to refuse life saving treatment.
Governor Malloy recently reappointed former state Supreme Court Justice Joette Katz as Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (“DCF”), reflecting his faith in her ability to run the critically important, but much maligned, agency. And, by accepting that reappointment, Katz revealed that she is either a saint or a glutton for punishment.
The punishment may continue (undeservedly so in my humble opinion) as the public learns more about a case that the Connecticut Supreme Court will hear, on an expedited/emergency basis, this Thursday, January 8. The case, In re Cassandra C., involves a now 17-year-old girl who was diagnosed last September with cancer, specifically, high-risk Hodgkin’s lymphoma. (Several media entities reported on the case over the past few days. However, the existence of the expedited appeal has been reflected on the Supreme Court’s electronic docket since mid-December.)
As Cassandra’s attorneys acknowledge in their appellate brief, “[t]he…
View original post 2,152 more words
Preliminary thoughts on #CassandraC case in Connecticut
via the Hartford Courant. This afternoon the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the 17-year old woman identified in court documents as Cassandra C. “is not legally mature enough to decide against life-saving chemotherapy” for Hodgkins lymphoma.
Despite a poor prognosis without chemotherapy, Cassandra refused treatment from the beginning and after she missed several medical appointments last fall her doctors reported her case to the state’s Department of Children and Families (DCF), accusing her mother, Jackie Fortin of Windsor Locks, with medical neglect. The DCF removed Cassandra from her home and placed her in state custody. Cassandra ran away in November after receiving two treatments . After she returned a week later, she was placed in Connecticut Children’s Medical Center where she continued to receive medical treatment. Meanwhile, Cassandra’s mother and lawyers filed an appeal with the state’s highest court. The court documents contend that the right to bodily integrity, “which is so fundamentally a part of the human experience that its recognition and protection stretch back long before any written constitution” applies to minors as well as adults. Cassandra’s lawyers draw on the legal concept of a “mature minor” which allows minors to give consent to medical procedures if they can show that they are mature enough to make a decision on their own.
Since I’ve written a book on the history of adolescent medicine, I’ve been following this case since last September. My university relations office has given my name to the local press, who may or may not be contacting me for an interview. Meanwhile, I’ll post my preliminary thoughts. The mature minor concept was the cornerstone of U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving a minor’s right to consent to health care, including receiving birth control and abortion, without parental approval or knowledge. (see Baird v. Eisenstadt and Bellotti v. Baird).
As much as I disagree with Cassandra’s decision to refuse treatment, I think the mature minor concept is applicable to this case. Now I’m waiting for the phone to ring. . .
Knitting Clio 2014 in review
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
A New York City subway train holds 1,200 people. This blog was viewed about 4,200 times in 2014. If it were a NYC subway train, it would take about 4 trips to carry that many people.
Signal Boost: Nursing Clio on The Nanny State on Your Plate?
Food for thought. . . (feel free to groan at the pun!) Seriously, I’m writing a review of Laura Dawes’ Childhood Obesity in America: Biography of an Epidemic for the American Historical Review so this is helpful. I don’t think Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” initiative is moralistic, though.
Hashtag Activism: #crimingwhilewhite vs. #alivewhileblack
Via this article from the Guardian, where Jessica Valenti describes how the “latest viral hashtag started on Wednesday night after the Garner decision came down and, using it, white people have detailed crimes they’ve committed without much trouble (let alone violence) from authorities. The hashtag is meant to be a glimpse into the incredible world of white privilege, where you can shoplift and get away with it, dine and dash with impunity, tell a cop to fuck off or even have one drive you to the ATM for bail money on the way to jail.”
Valenti says that the hashtag, while meant to help, actually perpetuates rather than undercuts white privilege. According to Valenti:
“While these stories do highlight just how biased law enforcement in the US really can be, #CrimingWhileWhite has the unfortunate side effect of redirecting focus from the continued police violence against communities and people of color back to white people and their experiences. (Nate Silver’s post-Ferguson “burrito” story, which was widely condemned as tone-deaf, is unfortunately typical of the genre.)
White people acknowledging white privilege is important, but in the midst of national tragedies, tweeting about how you got away with criminal acts feel like a performance of awareness that you are privileged rather than what we really need – a dismantling of the power obtained through that privilege.”
I disagree — the hashtag #crimingwhilewhite forces white people to unpack what Peggy McIntosh calls the “invisible knapsack” of white privilege. In a her classic 1988 essay, McIntosh described how she unpacked her invisible knapsack by identifying “conditions of daily experience that I once took for granted” which included things like “If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race.” According to McIntosh, “obliviousness about white advantage, like obliviousness about male advantage, is kept strongly inculturated in the United States so as to maintain the myth of meritocracy, the myth that democratic choice is equally available to all. Keeping most people unaware that freedom of confident action is there for just a small number of people props up those in power and serves to keep power in the hands of the same groups that have most of it already.” In order to “redesign social systems,” says McIntosh, “we need first to acknowledge their colossal unseen dimensions.”
Contributing stories to the #crimingwhilewhite hashtag, and reading all these side by side with the #alivewhileblack stories (which you can do easily with this Storify by Haley Whisennand) is a collective unpacking of the backpack for white people in America and elsewhere. It’s a small step but we need to start somewhere.
Crafting Womanhood
Knitting Clio approves!
This week in the NY Times: “Sybil: A Brilliant Hysteric?”
Fascinating article. I’ve been intrigued by this case since the bio-pic starting Sally Fields came out in the 1970s.

This week, columnist Clyde Haberman published a piece in the New York Times dealing with the fluidity of the Dissociative Identity Disorder diagnosis. The author chronicles its troubled past and uncertain future by making various references to the history of psychiatry.
The article is accompanied by a 12-minute video documentary entitled “Sybil: A Brilliant Hysteric?” which features archival footage and interviews with this story’s key protagonists.
Readers of H-Madness might also be interested in having a look at the accompanying comments, some of which read very like an ode to anti-psychiatry.
To access the piece and video, click here.
Digital History: Archives, Mapping, and Visualizations
Fascinating!
Anglophile in Academia: Annie Swafford's Blog
Below are links from my 10/22 talk on Digital History.
Archives:
Papers of the War Department: http://wardepartmentpapers.org/index.php
Emergence of Advertising in America: http://library.duke.edu/digitalcollections/eaa/
Votes for Women: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/naw/nawshome.html
Victorian Dictionary: http://www.victorianlondon.org/index-2012.htm
Proceedings of the Old Bailey: http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/
Mapping:
Locating London’s Past: http://www.locatinglondon.org/
Mapping the Republic of Letters: http://republicofletters.stanford.edu/
Invasion of America: http://invasionofamerica.ehistory.org/
Slave Revolt in Jamaica: http://revolt.axismaps.com/project.html
Spread of Slavery: http://lincolnmullen.com/projects/slavery/
Visualizing Emancipation: http://dsl.richmond.edu/emancipation/
Voting America: United States Politics, 1840-2008: http://dsl.richmond.edu/voting/
3D Models:
Rome Reborn: http://romereborn.frischerconsulting.com/gallery-current.php
Virtual Paul’s Cross Project: http://vpcp.chass.ncsu.edu/
Multimedia Archives:
Roaring Twenties, historical soundscape: http://vectors.usc.edu/projects/index.php?project=98
Library of Congress, Recorded Sound Reference Center: http://www.loc.gov/rr/record/onlinecollections.html
Resources:
Doing DH: http://history2014.doingdh.org/readings-and-resources/sites/
Programming Historian: http://programminghistorian.org/
Spatial History Project: http://web.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/cgi-bin/site/index.php

