Going to Berlin

No, I’m not talking about Senator Obama’s upcoming speech this afternoon.  This is simply a plug for my study abroad course next summer, “The Berlin Wall in American Memory.”  Brief course description:

This course explores a range of historical topics that have emerged in the twenty years since the fall of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989. Questions that this course will consider include: What has been the historical relationship and interdependency between the United States and Germany? What was the significance of the allies in first crushing fascism and then rebuilding West Germany with the Marshall Plan? How did the United States assist Berlin when the city was isolated by the Russian military in the late 1940s? How and why did the Berlin Wall go up? Why and how was it taken down? What signs of post-Cold War Europe are still visible in Berlin twenty years after unification? What was the role of American, German, and Soviet political leaders in helping to end the Cold War? What was the role of the mass media and the film industry in facilitating and documenting change? To answer these questions, this course will visit historically significant sites in Berlin and selected cities in the former East Germany.

Now, all this is tentative, given the weak dollar, outrageous airfares, and the fact that I’m competing with 37 other study abroad programs next year, including four or five others in history.  Maybe using this video as advertising will give me an edge:

Politics Trumps Science (again) in the Bush White House

I’ve been following the various news reports regarding President Bush’s current HHS draft proposal regarding birth control.  I was heartened to see how many members of congress have told him to shove it, led by a certain Senator from New York.  Now, please tell me, why isn’t the Senator from Illinois saying anything about this?  Maybe he’s afraid he’ll make another slip on the issue of reproductive rights.  Still, he should give it a shot — he couldn’t do any worse than this from the Republican candidate:

Book Club: Dervishes

This month, I suggested Beth Helms’ book Dervishes because of my trip to Turkey.  The novel is set in Ankara during the 1970s and tells the story of 12-year old Canada, her disinterested mother Grace, and her alcoholic father, a U.S. ambassador, who live within the dysfunctional world of American and Canadian diplomatic families.  I was hoping the book would have more information about the political and historical situation in Turkey at that time, but it focused solely on the infighting between the various wives of diplomats, who are bored and isolated from the culture either by choice or design; and their children who generally run wild and try to adapt as best they can to frequent moves.  The setting reminded me a bit of a Henry James novel, especially Daisy Miller, where the Americans abroad keep to themselves, in a foreign country but not of it — except of course this being a modern novel, the bored housewives have affairs with the local men and fight with each other for lovers and status.  In the end the novel was not as good as I hoped — certainly the writing was superb but the ending was rushed and disappointing.  It definitely was worth reading though.

Bonus track — while onboard the Almira, I read Snow by Orhan Pamuk.  It was an interesting contrast to read about the clash between secularists and political Islamists in the eastern portion of Turkey, while traveling through the very European western region (especially Bodrum which except for the Mosques was pretty similar to other beach towns in southern Europe — a lot of British youngsters clubbing at night, roasting themselves on the beach during the day).  I’m also glad I read it in summer, since this is a quite dark and depressing look at the fate of a political exile named Ka who returns from 12 years in Germany to the small town of Kars to investigate a spate of suicides among observant Muslim girls, and to try to win back the love of his life.  It was a tough read — lots of intrigue, reversals, and betrayals.  I’ll probably have to go and look up the historical events on which it’s based before I fully understand it.

Next up:  Wild Nights, a collection of short stories Joyce Carol Oates, in which she imagines the last days of Edgar Allen Poe, Henry James, Emily Dickinson, Samuel Clemens, and Ernest Hemingway.  The concept alone is intriguing.

Word to My Chiropractor

I’m a recent convert to the benefits of chiropractic for back pain — was suffering for months before I finally decided to give it a go.  The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine also lists from persuasive scientific evidence in favor of use of chiropractic for certain conditions.

Now, my chiropractor is a nice guy and does an excellent job at spinal manipulation– but he’s about to venture outside what I consider to be the appropriate boundaries of his profession by giving a lecture at our local tea shop/herbal apothecary about childhood vaccines — the title of the talk is vague, but it’s clear from the description that he’s not in favor of them, suggesting that they overwhelm the immune system. This, I think, goes too far — after all, chiropractors are not trained in immunology — and this crackpot theory has not been scientifically proven. [see the CDC website for mythbusting on this issue]

What is very clear, though, is the impact of declining vaccination rates on disease incidence in certain communities in the United States.  Take Colorado, where the rate of vaccination (75%) is below what is needed for herd immunity.  Between 1996 and 2005, 208 adults and 32 children in Colorado died of diseases that could most likely have been prevented by vaccinations. The state spends millions of dollars per year caring for children and adults with diseases such as pertussis (whooping cough), influenza, and measles that could have been prevented by vaccination.  California has also seen a sharp increase in rates of childhood diseases — e.g. a recent epidemic of measles in the San Diego area.

Now, some might say, well these childhood diseases are harmless — when we were kids, we just all got the measles at the same time and we were fine.  Well, historical facts show a different story — before the measles vaccine became available in 1963, there were typically 250,000-500,000 cases of measles per year, resulting in 500 or more deaths.

All this leads me back to the work I’m doing on HPV vaccines, which I’m revising for the Society of the Social History of Medicine conference in Glasgow this September.  Our Bodies, Our Blog recently posted a critique of “fearmongering” in a CNN report on the HPV vaccine.  I like the moderate and sensible position they take: they state that “of course we should keep watch when a new drug, vaccine or product is approved and is targeted to women” but “incomplete and inaccurate reporting and misrepresentation of the science does nothing to assist women and families in making decisions about vaccination and safety.”

Women Bishops and the Anglican Church

While we were in Turkey, the Church of England finally joined the modern age and announced it would allow women to become bishops — something the Episcopal Church of USA has been doing for some time. The Most Rev Katherine Jefferts Schori, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church of the USA, had this to say about the C of E’s footdragging on the issue of women bishops, stating that it was due to “personal antipathy,” and “a misunderstanding of leadership in the early church. The early church had women in leadership roles.” She also predicted that within the next 50 years there will be a female Archbishop of Canterbury — wouldn’t that be cool, especially if she were like the Vicar of Dibley! [well, maybe not a “babe with a bob cut and a magnificent bosom,” but hopefully someone with a sense of humor who would shake things up and bring the church in line with the gender politics of the 21st century]

Our weekly church bulletin at Trinity Episcopal in Collinsville has an article from Episcopal Life weekly regarding women bishops, part of a series on the Lambeth Conference that started this past week. It’s only been a decade since the LC first included women bishops, and of course, the Archbishop of Canterbury has excluded Rt. Reverend Bishop Gene Robinson of New Hampshire from this year’s conference. Still, gender disparities are very evident — women still only make up a tiny percentage of bishops in the Anglican church, and the plenary sessions are dominated by men — all this despite the fact that 70% of Anglicans worldwide are female. The annual meeting of Anglican women at the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women suggests that women’s concerns diverge markedly from that of male bishops. Major issues include maternal and child health, violence against women, equity in education and employment — in short lots of issues consistent with feminism (although our the blurb does not use that word — would offend those guys in our congregation who like to pick on Hillary).

Being a women’s historian, I can’t help but note that all of this sounds mighty familiar — Jane Addams and other Progressive Era reformers were inspired by the social gospel movement, which applied Christian principles to the social problems of the era. [for more on this, see Gender and the Social Gospel].

Back from Vacation in Turkey

Howdy folks,

Just wanted to let you all know I’m back from vacation in Turkey with husband and friends. We did a great archaeological tour/gulet cruise with Peter Sommer Travels. The last time I took an ancient history course was in 1981, so this was unfamiliar territory for me. It was nice to be a student again. We had two great great tour leaders: Michael Metcalfe, who teaches for Fairfield University’s Study Abroad program in Sicily; and Ayse Livesley, who runs various kayak/mountain bike/walking tours with her husband Dean.

We’re still sorting out photos and getting resettled so will blog more about this later.

Cycling and Punditry

It’s not often I write about cycling and politics in the same post, but I just had to report on the exchange about Barack Obama over at the Eastern Bloc Cycling Club forum. It all started with a link to an AP story and photo of the senator riding his bike along Lake Michigan. One guy who works at Benidorm Bikes and Boards, who is also an adjunct professor of Geography at my university, said he looked like a dork, and that at least we now have a mountain biker in the White House. This “dork” statement arose from what he thought was a very large fender on the back of the senator’s bike. Since this guy works in a bike shop, one would think that he would recognize a tag-along bike trailer when he saw one!

Another guy retorted, “ right now we have a criminal in the WH, passing off as a president. Dork or world-class leader, Obama will be a major improvement.”

This led to a full out political battle, including allegations that Obama would impose a luxury tax on bicycles (dude, that would only be on ones that cost more than $40,000 — please tell me why you need a solid gold bicycle?) as well as a link to Barack Obama is Your New Bicycle.

What bugs me most about the posts by my so-called colleague in Geography is his cracks about other academics – e.g. “When it comes to my President I want someone with “bottom”, not a light weight intellectual. I work with them at CCSU every semester.”

At least he didn’t call us intellectual light-weights — still, I’m wondering if his chair and department mates would like to hear that? Also, not sure what he means by bottom. Is he comparing the sizes of the two senators’ read-ends? !

You can read the entire exchange here. I’m about to go on vacation in Turkey for two weeks, starting Wednesday, so won’t be replying to this anymore, and won’t be moderating this blog until I get back.

Hendrik Herzberg needs a History Lesson

This morning, I read Hendrik Herzberg’s article, “Exhilaration” in the comment section of the New Yorker, in which he describes the historic primary battle between Barack Obama and Hilary Rodham Clinton. In general, it’s a pretty fair treatment, but he sure needs a more nuanced history of gender and race in the United States. According to Herzberg:

“Competitions among grievances do not ennoble, and both Clinton and Obama strove to avoid one; but it does not belittle the oppressions of gender to suggest that in America the oppressions of race have cut deeper. Clinton’s supporters would sometimes note that the Constitution did not extend the vote to women until a half century after it extended it to men of color. But there is no gender equivalent of the nightmare of disenfranchisement, lynching, apartheid, and peonage that followed Reconstruction, to say nothing of “the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil” that preceded it. Nor has any feminist leader shared the fate of Medgar Evers, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X. Clinton spoke on Saturday of “women in their eighties and nineties, born before women could vote.” But Barack Obama is only in his forties, and he was born before the Voting Rights Act redeemed the broken promise of the Fifteenth Amendment.”

Now, there may be some truth to this, but I find there are two things wrong with this paragraph:

1. He assumes all women are white — what about the African-American women who faced the threat of rape by white men, who would go unpunished since all black women were considered “sluts” and “temptresses” who deserved what they got, even if they were five years old? Or the Native American women who were forced on a death march to “Indian territory” by Andrew Jackson, only to be thrown off that land half a century later?

2. I would consider the English common law practice of “femme covert” or legal death of women upon marriage to be equivalent to debt peonage at the very least. Women lost control of their property, their children, and even their bodies. Also, until women were denied access to many educational and professional opportunities, until the Civil Rights Act of 1965 and Title IX. Women who fought for suffrage and equal rights were imprisoned, labeled “insane,” and trivialized, even by men on the left.

Anyone else care to contribute?